SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Tungsten Automation

Other Tax compliance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tungsten Automation does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Tungsten Automation on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tungsten Automation has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Tungsten Automation does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tungsten Automation does notTungsten Automation publishes, and they do not
Avalaraavalara.com 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Quadernoquaderno.io 35/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
VAT ITvatit.com 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Vertexvertexinc.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Billitbillit.eu 35/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Fintuafintua.com 35/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Kontistkontist.com 35/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Amazon VAT Partnertaxually.com 26/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Data location stated Compare
Countxcountx.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Staxxerstaxxer.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Accountableaccountable.de 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Amavatamavat.eu 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.