Alternatives to Brightfin
Other Telecom and SaaS expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Brightfin does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 17 that differ from Brightfin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Brightfin has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Brightfin does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Brightfin does not | Brightfin publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valencevalencesecurity.com | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Obsidianobsidiansecurity.com | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Spendbasespendbase.co | 59/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Flexeraflexera.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Augmenttaugmentt.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Nudge Securitynudgesecurity.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Vcomvcomsolutions.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Calerocalero.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Cocuscocus.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Recoreco.ai | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Axiansaxians.de | 22/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Bettercloudbettercloud.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.