SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Tangoe

Other Telecom and SaaS expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Tangoe. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Tangoe on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tangoe has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Tangoe” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TangoeFound at Tangoe, not found there
Augmenttaugmentt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Augmentt 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Spendbasespendbase.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Spendbase 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Flexeraflexera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flexera 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Obsidianobsidiansecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Obsidian 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Tropictropicapp.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tropic 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Valencevalencesecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valence 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Wingswithwings.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Wings 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Calerocalero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Calero 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Cocuscocus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cocus 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Recoreco.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Reco 26/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Sakonsakon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sakon 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
Axiansaxians.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Axians 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.