SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Coreplus

Other Telehealth platforms vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Coreplus does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from Coreplus on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Coreplus has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Coreplus does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Coreplus does notCoreplus publishes, and they do not
Janejane.app 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Halaxyhalaxy.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Zandazandahealth.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Healthiegethealthie.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Updoxupdox.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Doxy.medoxy.me 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Dermanosticdermanostic.com 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Public pricing Compare
Owl Practiceowlpractice.ca 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Arztkonsultationarztkonsultation.de 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Sanvartissanvartis.de 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
Livilivi.co.uk 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
MDLivemdlive.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.