Transparency alternatives to Dermanostic
Other Telehealth platforms vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dermanostic. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Dermanostic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dermanostic has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Dermanostic” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Dermanostic | Found at Dermanostic, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janejane.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Jane | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Halaxyhalaxy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Halaxy | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zandazandahealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zanda | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Teladoc Healthteladochealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teladoc Health | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Doxy.medoxy.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Doxy.me | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sprucesprucehealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spruce | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Healthiegethealthie.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Healthie | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Corepluscorepluspm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coreplus | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vseevsee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vsee | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Arztkonsultationarztkonsultation.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Arztkonsultation | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sanvartissanvartis.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Sanvartis | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Owl Practiceowlpractice.caSee also Transparency alternatives to Owl Practice | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.