Alternatives to Virtuoso
Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Virtuoso does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Virtuoso on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Virtuoso has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Virtuoso does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Virtuoso does not | Virtuoso publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypresscypress.io | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PractiTestpractitest.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BrowserStackbrowserstack.com | 63/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Endtestendtest.io | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Applitoolsapplitools.com | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Katalonkatalon.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| ACCELQaccelq.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Applauseapplause.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Kobitonkobiton.com | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| QA Wolfqawolf.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Allure TestOpsqameta.io | 30/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.