SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to DocMagic

Other Title and closing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that DocMagic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from DocMagic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

DocMagic has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and DocMagic does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and DocMagic does notDocMagic publishes, and they do not
Qualiaqualia.com 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Proofproof.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
CertifIDcertifid.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
NotaryCamnotarycam.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Stavvystavvy.com 35/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Closinglockclosinglock.com 26/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
RamQuestramquest.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
AtCloseatclose.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Endpointendpoint.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Blueprint Titleblueprinttitle.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Domadoma.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
E-Closingeclosing.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.