SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to e2open

Other Trade compliance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that e2open does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from e2open on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

e2open has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and e2open does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and e2open does note2open publishes, and they do not
Zonoszonos.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
AEBaeb.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
Cargowisewisetechglobal.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
ImportGeniusimportgenius.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
MIC Customsmic-cust.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Customs4tradecustoms4trade.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Blume Globalblumeglobal.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Kewillblujaysolutions.com 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
BDP Smartbdpsmart.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Nexus Tradenexustrade.io 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
OCR Servicesocr-inc.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Descartes CustomsInfocustomsinfo.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.