Transparency alternatives to Transify
Other Transport planning and simulation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Transify does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
5 shown of 4 that differ from Transify on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Transify has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Transify does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Transify does not | Transify publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invarioninvarion.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| PTV Hubptvgroup.com | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| DCbraindcbrain.com | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| HeavyGoodsheavygoods.net | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Korbatokorbato.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.