SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Roomex

Other Business travel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Roomex does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from Roomex on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Roomex has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Roomex does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Roomex does notRoomex publishes, and they do not
BizAwaybizaway.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
TravelPerktravelperk.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Spotnanaspotnana.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
BCD Travelbcdtravel.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Serkoserko.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Blacklaneblacklane.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Selective Travelselective-travel.co.uk 13/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Fairjunglefairjungle.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Itiliteitilite.com 22/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
TravelBanktravelbank.com 22/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
CWTmycwt.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bolt Businessbolt.eu 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.