Transparency alternatives to TravelPerk
Other Business travel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at TravelPerk. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from TravelPerk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
TravelPerk has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at TravelPerk” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at TravelPerk | Found at TravelPerk, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serkoserko.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Serko | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Zauizaui.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zaui | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| BizAwaybizaway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BizAway | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Lemaxlemax.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Lemax | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| TravelBanktravelbank.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TravelBank | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Spotnanaspotnana.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spotnana | 30/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| BCD Travelbcdtravel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BCD Travel | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CWTmycwt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CWT | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fairjunglefairjungle.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fairjungle | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Supertrippersupertripper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supertripper | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cegidcegid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cegid | 22/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Itiliteitilite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Itilite | 22/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.