SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Prism

Other Venue ticketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Prism does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

11 shown of 11 that differ from Prism on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Prism has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Prism does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Prism does notPrism publishes, and they do not
AudienceViewaudienceview.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
DICEdice.fm 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
TicketSpiceticketspice.com 26/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Fatsomafatsoma.com 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
accessoaccesso.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Connect&GOconnectngo.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Leap Eventsleapevents.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
PatronManagerpatronmanager.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Digiticketsdigitickets.co.uk 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Eventixeventix.io 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Galaxy Ticketinggatewayticketing.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.