SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Semnox

Other Venue ticketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Semnox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 11 that differ from Semnox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Semnox has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Semnox does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Semnox does notSemnox publishes, and they do not
AudienceViewaudienceview.com 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 nothing Compare
Rollerroller.software 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
TicketSpiceticketspice.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Prismprism.fm 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Fatsomafatsoma.com 22/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Skiddleskiddle.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
DICEdice.fm 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
TicketCoticketco.events 9/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
accessoaccesso.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Connect&GOconnectngo.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Leap Eventsleapevents.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
PatronManagerpatronmanager.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.