SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Goose

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Goose does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from Goose on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Goose has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Goose does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Goose does notGoose publishes, and they do not
WeVideowevideo.com 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Loomloom.com 61/100 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Simplecastsimplecast.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
api.videoapi.video 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Vidyardvidyard.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Muxmux.com 52/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
JWXjwx.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Vimeovimeo.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Auphonicauphonic.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Tellatella.tv 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Transistortransistor.fm 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.