SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Julep

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Julep does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Julep on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Julep has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Julep does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Julep does notJulep publishes, and they do not
Loomloom.com 74/100 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 nothing Compare
api.videoapi.video 78/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Vidyardvidyard.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Muxmux.com 52/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
JW Playerjwplayer.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Descriptdescript.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Auphonicauphonic.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Podbeanpodbean.com 36/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Acastacast.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Dacastdacast.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Captivatecaptivate.fm 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.