SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to scoopa

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that scoopa does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 50 that differ from scoopa on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

scoopa has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and scoopa does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and scoopa does notscoopa publishes, and they do not
Simplecastsimplecast.com 78/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
WeVideowevideo.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Loomloom.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
api.videoapi.video 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Vidyardvidyard.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Auphonicauphonic.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Muxmux.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Transistortransistor.fm 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
JWXjwx.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Tellatella.tv 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Dacastdacast.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.