Transparency alternatives to EasyEcom
Other Warehouse management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at EasyEcom. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from EasyEcom on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
EasyEcom has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at EasyEcom” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at EasyEcom | Found at EasyEcom, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowspaceflow.spaceSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowspace | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Infoplusinfopluscommerce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infoplus | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Fulfil.iofulfil.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fulfil.io | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Balloon Oneballoonone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Balloon One | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Cadre Technologiescadretech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cadre Technologies | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Datapel WMSdatapel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datapel WMS | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Generixgenerixgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Generix | 30/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| AutoStoreautostoresystem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AutoStore | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Optioryxoptioryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Optioryx | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Knappknapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Knapp | 19/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Bitlog WMSbitlogwms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bitlog WMS | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Ehrhardt Partnerepg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ehrhardt Partner | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.