SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Emoney

Other Wealth management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Emoney does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Emoney on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Emoney has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Emoney does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Emoney does notEmoney publishes, and they do not
Orionorion.com 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated nothing Compare
Addeparaddepar.com 36/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Asset-mapasset-map.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Holistiplanholistiplan.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Altruistaltruist.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Avaloqavaloq.com 27/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Aixigoaixigo.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Betterment Advisorbetterment.com 26/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Ponterapontera.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Fnzfnz.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Nitrogennitrogenwealth.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Additivadditiv.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.