SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Evooq

Other Wealth management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Evooq does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Evooq on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Evooq has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Evooq does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Evooq does notEvooq publishes, and they do not
Orionorion.com 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Addeparaddepar.com 36/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Asset-mapasset-map.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Altruistaltruist.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Betterment Advisorbetterment.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Holistiplanholistiplan.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Avaloqavaloq.com 27/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Aixigoaixigo.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ponterapontera.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Nitrogennitrogenwealth.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Additivadditiv.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Emoneyemoneyadvisor.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.