SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Growney

Other Wealth management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Growney does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from Growney on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Growney has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Growney does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Growney does notGrowney publishes, and they do not
Orionorion.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Asset-mapasset-map.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Altruistaltruist.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Holistiplanholistiplan.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Miligetmili.ai 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Bank Vontobel Techvontobel.com 26/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Betterment Advisorbetterment.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Ponterapontera.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
FA Solutionsfasolutions.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nitrogennitrogenwealth.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ychartsycharts.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Avaloqavaloq.com 27/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.