Transparency alternatives to Wealthfront
Other Wealth management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Wealthfront. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Wealthfront on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Wealthfront has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Wealthfront” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Wealthfront | Found at Wealthfront, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orionorion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orion | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Miligetmili.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Mili | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Betterment Advisorbetterment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betterment Advisor | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Altruistaltruist.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Altruist | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Addeparaddepar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Addepar | 36/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Asset-mapasset-map.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset-map | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Avaloqavaloq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avaloq | 27/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Aixigoaixigo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aixigo | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Bank Vontobel Techvontobel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bank Vontobel Tech | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Ponterapontera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pontera | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Wealtharcwealtharc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wealtharc | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ychartsycharts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ycharts | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.