SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Mili

Other Wealth management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Mili does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Mili on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mili has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Mili does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Mili does notMili publishes, and they do not
Bank Vontobel Techvontobel.com 26/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Orionorion.com 43/100 1 Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Asset-mapasset-map.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Holistiplanholistiplan.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Altruistaltruist.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Betterment Advisorbetterment.com 26/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Addeparaddepar.com 23/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
FA Solutionsfasolutions.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Nitrogennitrogenwealth.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ychartsycharts.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Infrontinfront.co 17/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Wealthfrontwealthfront.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.