Transparency alternatives to Whistlelink
Other Whistleblowing systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Whistlelink. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Whistlelink on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Whistlelink has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Whistlelink” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Whistlelink | Found at Whistlelink, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethenagoethena.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethena | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| FaceUpfaceup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FaceUp | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| NAVEXnavex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NAVEX | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Trustytrusty.reportSee also Transparency alternatives to Trusty | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Whispliwhispli.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whispli | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| EQS Groupeqs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EQS Group | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Ethicontrolethicontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethicontrol | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Syntriosyntrio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Syntrio | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Whistleblower Softwarewhistleblowersoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistleblower Software | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Signalistsignalist.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Signalist | 29/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Case IQcaseiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Case IQ | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Ethicoethico.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethico | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.