SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Ethena

Other Whistleblowing systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ethena. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Ethena on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ethena has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ethena” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at EthenaFound at Ethena, not found there
Whistlelinkwhistlelink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistlelink 35/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
FaceUpfaceup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FaceUp 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
EQS Groupeqs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EQS Group 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
NAVEXnavex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NAVEX 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Signalistsignalist.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Signalist 29/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Case IQcaseiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Case IQ 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Ethicoethico.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethico 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Mitratechmitratech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mitratech 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Whispliwhispli.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whispli 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Subprocessor list Compare
SAI360sai360.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SAI360 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Convercentconvercent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Convercent 13/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Trustytrusty.reportSee also Transparency alternatives to Trusty 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Subprocessor list Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.