Transparency alternatives to D-BIT
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that D-BIT does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 79 that differ from D-BIT on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
D-BIT has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and D-BIT does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and D-BIT does not | D-BIT publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.com | 70/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 57/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| When I Workwheniwork.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Clockodoclockodo.com | 30/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.