SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Rhombus

Other Physical access control and video security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rhombus. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 44 that differ from Rhombus on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Rhombus has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Rhombus” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at RhombusFound at Rhombus, not found there
Kisigetkisi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kisi 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
SmartRentsmartrent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRent 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Verkadaverkada.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Verkada 59/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Genetecgenetec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genetec 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
Geneagetgenea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genea 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
ButterflyMXbutterflymx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ButterflyMX 35/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
ProdataKeyprodatakey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProdataKey 29/100 1 Data location stated 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Avigilonavigilon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avigilon 27/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Ambient.aiambient.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Ambient.ai 26/100 1 Data location stated 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Spot AIspot.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Spot AI 26/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Brivobrivo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brivo 22/100 1 Status page with history 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Axis Communicationsaxis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axis Communications 17/100 1 Status page with history 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.