Transparency alternatives to ButterflyMX
Other Physical access control and video security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ButterflyMX. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from ButterflyMX on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ButterflyMX has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at ButterflyMX” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ButterflyMX | Found at ButterflyMX, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetecgenetec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genetec | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Kisigetkisi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kisi | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SmartRentsmartrent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRent | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Axis Communicationsaxis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axis Communications | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Verkadaverkada.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Verkada | 59/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rhombusrhombus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rhombus | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Avigilonavigilon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avigilon | 27/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Spot AIspot.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Spot AI | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Milestone Systemsmilestonesys.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Milestone Systems | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Solinksolink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Solink | 17/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Geneagetgenea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genea | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Brivobrivo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brivo | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.