SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Genea

Other Physical access control and video security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Genea. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 44 that differ from Genea on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Genea has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Genea” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at GeneaFound at Genea, not found there
Genetecgenetec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genetec 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Kisigetkisi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kisi 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Rhombusrhombus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rhombus 30/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Milestone Systemsmilestonesys.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Milestone Systems 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Verkadaverkada.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Verkada 59/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
SmartRentsmartrent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRent 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
ButterflyMXbutterflymx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ButterflyMX 35/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Avigilonavigilon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avigilon 27/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Spot AIspot.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Spot AI 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Axis Communicationsaxis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axis Communications 17/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Solinksolink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Solink 17/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
SureViewsureviewsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SureView 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.