Transparency alternatives to Bill
Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Bill. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 70 that differ from Bill on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Bill has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Bill” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Bill | Found at Bill, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AccountKitaccount-kit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccountKit | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Acodeiacodei.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acodei | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Odooodoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Odoo | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Xeroxero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xero | 36/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Clear Booksclearbooks.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Clear Books | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FreeAgentfreeagent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FreeAgent | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fortnoxfortnox.seSee also Transparency alternatives to Fortnox | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tripletextripletex.noSee also Transparency alternatives to Tripletex | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bokiobokio.seSee also Transparency alternatives to Bokio | 13/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Zervantzervant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zervant | 36/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Lightyearlightyear.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightyear | 30/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Billomatbillomat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billomat | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.