SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Acodei

Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Acodei. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 70 that differ from Acodei on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Acodei has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Acodei” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AcodeiFound at Acodei, not found there
Odooodoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Odoo 39/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
AccountKitaccount-kit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccountKit 70/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Xeroxero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xero 36/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Zervantzervant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zervant 36/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
AuditFileauditfile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AuditFile 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Clear Booksclearbooks.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Clear Books 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
FreeAgentfreeagent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FreeAgent 30/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Billbill.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bill 26/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Billomatbillomat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billomat 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Meliomelio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Melio 26/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Candiscandis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Candis 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Fortnoxfortnox.seSee also Transparency alternatives to Fortnox 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.