Transparency alternatives to Fortnox
Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fortnox. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 70 that differ from Fortnox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fortnox has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Fortnox” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fortnox | Found at Fortnox, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AccountKitaccount-kit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccountKit | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Acodeiacodei.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acodei | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Odooodoo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Odoo | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Xeroxero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xero | 36/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Zervantzervant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zervant | 36/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Billbill.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bill | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Meliomelio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Melio | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Lightyearlightyear.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightyear | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Billomatbillomat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billomat | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| AuditFileauditfile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AuditFile | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Output Booksoutputbooks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Output Books | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Scribe Accountsscribeaccounts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scribe Accounts | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.