SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Skimlinks

Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Skimlinks does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Skimlinks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Skimlinks has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Skimlinks does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Skimlinks does notSkimlinks publishes, and they do not
Reditusgetreditus.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
PartnerStackpartnerstack.com 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Everfloweverflow.io 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
UpPromoteuppromote.com 45/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
LeadDynoleaddyno.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Partneropartnero.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Affiseaffise.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Channelscalerchannelscaler.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Referral Rockreferralrock.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Affonsoaffonso.io 39/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
ingeniousingenioustechnologies.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Webgainswebgains.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.