SaaS Ranking
Menu

PartnerStack: what they publish

partnerstack.com · Affiliate and partner marketing · checked 2026-10-15

61/100CBand C

Rank 2 of 41 in Affiliate and partner marketing, where the median is 22.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-15. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

4 days since the newest dated result, 4 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

PartnerStack

partnerstack.com · Affiliate and partner marketing

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
C 61of 100 Rank 2 of 41

Published commitments7 of 9 found

Measured behaviour0 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-15. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that PartnerStack has no such document.

Where PartnerStack sits in Affiliate and partner marketing

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 2%
  3. C2 5%
  4. D4 10%
  5. E12 29%
  6. F22 54%
41 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of PartnerStack is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What PartnerStack states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.partnerstack.com/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://partnerstack.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://partnerstack.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Affiliate and partner marketing: 7 of 44 companies

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://partnerstack.com/ – redirects to https://partnerstack.com/
  2. https://partnerstack.com/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Affiliate and partner marketing: 26 of 44 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://partnerstack.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: ajax.googleapis.com, api.default.com, api.hubapi.com, api.intellimize.co, api.mapbox.com, api.segment.io, cdn-cookieyes.com, cdn.intellimize.co, cdn.jsdelivr.net, cdn.prod.website-files.com, cdn.segment.com, cta-service-cms2.hubspot.com, d3e54v103j8qbb.cloudfront.net, ddwl4m2hdecbv.cloudfront.net, dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com, directory.cookieyes.com, fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com, forms-na1.hsforms.com, forms.hsforms.com, handshake.default.com, import-cdn.default.com, js.hs-banner.com, js.hs-scripts.com, js.hsadspixel.net, js.hsforms.net, js.hubspot.com, log.cookieyes.com, log.intellimize.co, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, perf-na1.hsforms.com, r2.leadsy.ai, sheets.googleapis.com, www.google.com, www.googletagmanager.com, www.gstatic.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Affiliate and partner marketing: 3 of 43 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://partnerstack.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://partnerstack.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://partnerstack.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://partnerstack.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://partnerstack.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://partnerstack.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://partnerstack.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://partnerstack.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Affiliate and partner marketing: 1 of 40 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://partnerstack.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Affiliate and partner marketing: 8 of 40 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 7
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://partnerstack.com/legal/data-processing-addendum · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Affiliate and partner marketing: 8 of 40 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://partnerstack.com/legal/sub-processors · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Affiliate and partner marketing: 4 of 41 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording London (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), United Kingdom (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters. The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    reland ‍ UK (United Kingdom) Representative ‍ VeraSafe United Kingdom Limited 37 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TL United Kingdom ‍ Privacy Practices Data Transfers PartnerStack’s platform and its rel...

    Read at https://partnerstack.com/legal/privacy-policy

    ited Kingdom) Representative ‍ VeraSafe United Kingdom Limited 37 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TL United Kingdom ‍ Privacy Practices Data Transfers PartnerStack’s platform and its related services a...

    Read at https://partnerstack.com/legal/privacy-policy

    ted Kingdom ‍ Privacy Practices Data Transfers PartnerStack’s platform and its related services are hosted in the United States and all information will be transferred into the United States for stora...

    Read at https://partnerstack.com/legal/privacy-policy

Source: https://partnerstack.com/legal/privacy-policy · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Data location stated in Affiliate and partner marketing: 17 of 42 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://partnerstack.com/pricing · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Public pricing in Affiliate and partner marketing: 22 of 43 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page SOC 2 Type II.
    Show the exact wording

    Compliance PartnerStack platform is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant against security, confidentiality, availability, processing integrity, and privacy

    Read at https://partnerstack.com/legal/security

Source: https://partnerstack.com/legal/security · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Certifications named in Affiliate and partner marketing: 4 of 42 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.5 %.
    Show the exact wording

    vels: ‍ PartnerStack will make commercially reasonable efforts to provide the Platform no less than 99.50% of the time each calendar month (the “Availability Service Level”).

    Read at https://partnerstack.com/legal/service-level-agreement

Source: https://partnerstack.com/legal/service-level-agreement · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Affiliate and partner marketing: 1 of 40 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://partnerstack.com/legal/privacy-policy · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Affiliate and partner marketing: 23 of 42 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-08: 61 of 1002026-10-15: 61 of 100 2026-10-08 2026-10-15
Score over the last 2 runs we measured PartnerStack in: 61 (2026-10-08), 61 (2026-10-15).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

PartnerStack

7 found · 5 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-15.

Investigate 5 open evidence questions
  1. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  2. HTTPS enforced with HSTS

    How is HTTPS enforced on the product and sign-in domains we will use? Please distinguish those domains from the public website.

    Inspect this check
  3. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  4. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  5. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.