Transparency alternatives to Trackier
Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Trackier does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Trackier on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Trackier has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Trackier does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Trackier does not | Trackier publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reditusgetreditus.com | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PartnerStackpartnerstack.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Everfloweverflow.io | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| LeadDynoleaddyno.com | 43/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Affiseaffise.com | 39/100 | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Channelscalerchannelscaler.com | 39/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Post Affiliate Propostaffiliatepro.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Awinawin.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Rewardfulgetrewardful.com | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Tapfiliatetapfiliate.com | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| UpPromoteuppromote.com | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Partneropartnero.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.