Transparency alternatives to Document360
Other API management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Document360. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Document360 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Document360 has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Document360” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Document360 | Found at Document360, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redoclyredocly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Redocly | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Moesifmoesif.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moesif | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Svixsvix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Svix | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hookdeckhookdeck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hookdeck | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Postmanpostman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Postman | 57/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Theneotheneo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Theneo | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Bump.shbump.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Bump.sh | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Apollo GraphQLapollographql.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Apollo GraphQL | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Stainlessstainless.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stainless | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Traefiktraefik.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Traefik | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kongkonghq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kong | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| ReadMereadme.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReadMe | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.