SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to d.vinci

Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that d.vinci does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from d.vinci on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

d.vinci has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and d.vinci does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and d.vinci does notd.vinci publishes, and they do not
Jobvitejobvite.com 85/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
JazzHRjazzhr.com 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Workableworkable.com 65/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Ashbyashbyhq.com 55/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
iCIMSicims.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.com 50/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Bullhornbullhorn.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Leverlever.co 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Manatalmanatal.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Homerunhomerun.co 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Joinjoin.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Greenhousegreenhouse.io 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.