Transparency alternatives to Jobvite
Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Jobvite. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Jobvite on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Jobvite has 3 gaps in what we could measure: No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Jobvite” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Jobvite | Found at Jobvite, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joinjoin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Join | 39/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Greenhousegreenhouse.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Greenhouse | 22/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Workableworkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workable | 61/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bullhornbullhorn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bullhorn | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| PrimePROprimepro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PrimePRO | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Homerunhomerun.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Homerun | 43/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| iCIMSicims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iCIMS | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Pinpointpinpointhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinpoint | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Wintrowintro.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Wintro | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Onlyfyonlyfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onlyfy | 23/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| impress.aiimpress.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to impress.ai | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| TalentNettalentnet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TalentNet | 9/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.