Transparency alternatives to impress.ai
Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at impress.ai. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from impress.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
impress.ai has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at impress.ai” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at impress.ai | Found at impress.ai, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobvitejobvite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobvite | 83/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| JazzHRjazzhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JazzHR | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRecruiters | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Workableworkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workable | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| JobAdderjobadder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JobAdder | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Bullhornbullhorn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bullhorn | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| PrimePROprimepro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PrimePRO | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Homerunhomerun.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Homerun | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Leverlever.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lever | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Joinjoin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Join | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Ashbyashbyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ashby | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| iCIMSicims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iCIMS | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.