SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Homerun

Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Homerun. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 43 that differ from Homerun on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Homerun has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Homerun” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at HomerunFound at Homerun, not found there
Jobvitejobvite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobvite 83/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
JazzHRjazzhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JazzHR 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRecruiters 57/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Workableworkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workable 61/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Bullhornbullhorn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bullhorn 48/100 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
PrimePROprimepro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PrimePRO 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Leverlever.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lever 43/100 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Manatalmanatal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Manatal 43/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
iCIMSicims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iCIMS 39/100 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Joinjoin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Join 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Ashbyashbyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ashby 35/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact Compare
Greenhousegreenhouse.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Greenhouse 22/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.