SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Barada Associates

Other Background screening vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Barada Associates does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Barada Associates on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Barada Associates has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Barada Associates does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Barada Associates does notBarada Associates publishes, and they do not
Xrefxref.com 70/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Zinczincwork.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
GoodHiregoodhire.com 48/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Certncertn.co 43/100 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Trueworktruework.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Asurintasurint.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Verified Firstverifiedfirst.com 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Checkrcheckr.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
AuthBridgeauthbridge.com 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Crimcheckcrimcheck.net 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
ScoutLogicscoutlogicscreening.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
First Advantagefadv.com 22/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.