SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Choice Screening

Other Background screening vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Choice Screening does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Choice Screening on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Choice Screening has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Choice Screening does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Choice Screening does notChoice Screening publishes, and they do not
Xrefxref.com 70/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Zinczincwork.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
GoodHiregoodhire.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Certncertn.co 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Trueworktruework.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Asurintasurint.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Verified Firstverifiedfirst.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
AuthBridgeauthbridge.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Checkrcheckr.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Crimcheckcrimcheck.net 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Accurate Backgroundaccurate.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
First Advantagefadv.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.