Transparency alternatives to Turn
Other Background screening vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Turn. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Turn on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Turn has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Turn” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Turn | Found at Turn, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xrefxref.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xref | 70/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Trueworktruework.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Truework | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| GoodHiregoodhire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoodHire | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Certncertn.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Certn | 43/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Asurintasurint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asurint | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Veremarkveremark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veremark | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Yardstikyardstik.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yardstik | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Cisivecisive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cisive | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| IDfyidfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDfy | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| SentryLinksentrylink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SentryLink | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Accurate Backgroundaccurate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accurate Background | 9/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| Zinczincwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zinc | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.