SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Truework

Other Background screening vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Truework does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Truework on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Truework has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Truework does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Truework does notTruework publishes, and they do not
Xrefxref.com 70/100 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Zinczincwork.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Certncertn.co 43/100 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
GoodHiregoodhire.com 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Checkrcheckr.com 26/100 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Asurintasurint.com 35/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Verified Firstverifiedfirst.com 35/100 1 Public pricing 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
AuthBridgeauthbridge.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Crimcheckcrimcheck.net 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
First Advantagefadv.com 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ScoutLogicscoutlogicscreening.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Accurate Backgroundaccurate.com 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.