Transparency alternatives to Rewind
Other Backup and recovery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rewind. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Rewind on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rewind has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Rewind” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Rewind | Found at Rewind, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duplicatiduplicati.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Duplicati | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SimpleBackupssimplebackups.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimpleBackups | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Barracudabarracuda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Barracuda | 47/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Afiafi.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Afi | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| BorgBaseborgbase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BorgBase | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SpinOnespin.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to SpinOne | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Keepitkeepit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keepit | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Acronisacronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acronis | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Comet Backupcometbackup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Comet Backup | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| HYCUhycu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HYCU | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SysCloudsyscloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SysCloud | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Carbonitecarbonite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carbonite | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.