Transparency alternatives to SimpleBackups
Other Backup and recovery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at SimpleBackups. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from SimpleBackups on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
SimpleBackups has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at SimpleBackups” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at SimpleBackups | Found at SimpleBackups, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keepitkeepit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keepit | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Rewindrewind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rewind | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Redstorredstor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Redstor | 32/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Duplicatiduplicati.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Duplicati | 57/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Afiafi.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Afi | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| BorgBaseborgbase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BorgBase | 39/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| SpinOnespin.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to SpinOne | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Barracudabarracuda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Barracuda | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Acronisacronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acronis | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cloudbackcloudback.itSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudback | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| HYCUhycu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HYCU | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Carbonitecarbonite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carbonite | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.