Transparency alternatives to Afi
Other Backup and recovery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Afi. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Afi on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Afi has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Afi” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Afi | Found at Afi, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rewindrewind.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rewind | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| SimpleBackupssimplebackups.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimpleBackups | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| BorgBaseborgbase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BorgBase | 39/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Keepitkeepit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keepit | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Redstorredstor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Redstor | 32/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Carbonitecarbonite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carbonite | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Barracudabarracuda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Barracuda | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Acronisacronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acronis | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| MSP360msp360.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MSP360 | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Veeamveeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veeam | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| SafeBytes Cloud Backupsafebytes.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SafeBytes Cloud Backup | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| UrBackupurbackup.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to UrBackup | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.