SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to CarePaths

Other Behavioral health vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CarePaths does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 14 that differ from CarePaths on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CarePaths has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CarePaths does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CarePaths does notCarePaths publishes, and they do not
BehaveHealthbehavehealth.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
AZZLYazzly.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Blueprintblueprint.ai 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Footholdfootholdtechnology.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
BestNotesbestnotes.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Ensora Healthensorahealth.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Opus EHRopusehr.com 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Lightning Steplightningstep.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Mirahmirah.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Rittenritten.io 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
MHSmhs.com 4/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
EMR Systemsemrsystems.net 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.