Alternatives to ScrapingBee
Other Browser automation and web data vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ScrapingBee does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from ScrapingBee on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ScrapingBee has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ScrapingBee does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ScrapingBee does not | ScrapingBee publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microlinkmicrolink.io | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Browser Usebrowser-use.com | 52/100 | 4 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Zytezyte.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Firecrawlfirecrawl.dev | 39/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Apifyapify.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Oxylabsoxylabs.io | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Urlboxurlbox.com | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Scrapflyscrapfly.io | 38/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Scrapingdogscrapingdog.com | 38/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Browserlessbrowserless.io | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| ZenRowszenrows.com | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Axiomaxiom.ai | 24/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.