Transparency alternatives to Browser Use
Other Browser automation and web data vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Browser Use. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Browser Use on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Browser Use has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Browser Use” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Browser Use | Found at Browser Use, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scrapingdogscrapingdog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scrapingdog | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Microlinkmicrolink.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Microlink | 57/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Firecrawlfirecrawl.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Firecrawl | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Browserlessbrowserless.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Browserless | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Hyperbrowserhyperbrowser.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperbrowser | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| ScrapingAntscrapingant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScrapingAnt | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| ScrapingBeescrapingbee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScrapingBee | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Steelsteel.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Steel | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Zytezyte.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zyte | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Apifyapify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Apify | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| ScreenshotAPIscreenshotapi.netSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenshotAPI | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
| ScreenshotOnescreenshotone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenshotOne | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.