Alternatives to Microlink
Other Browser automation and web data vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Microlink does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Microlink on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Microlink has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Microlink does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Microlink does not | Microlink publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Browser Usebrowser-use.com | 52/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Firecrawlfirecrawl.dev | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Zytezyte.com | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Browserlessbrowserless.io | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Oxylabsoxylabs.io | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Scrapflyscrapfly.io | 38/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Scrapingdogscrapingdog.com | 38/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ScrapingAntscrapingant.com | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| ScrapingBeescrapingbee.com | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Urlboxurlbox.com | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Axiomaxiom.ai | 24/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Bright Databrightdata.com | 22/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.